"Leftism" is Death (it's true)...
What does this image have to do with your life and future happiness?
Everything, really. This is the Hegelian Dialectic in action, and it’s why I decided to start a Substack dedicated to explaining it’s rather slippery and nefarious underpinnings. If we don’t understand how the dialectic shapes our perceptions of
the world, then we don’t know how we are helping to implement the vision.
In sum:
The Hegelian Dialectic is a deception meant to guide our thoughts and actions into conflicts that lead us to a predetermined solution.
You see, these techniques are sneaky, yet effective, but that is why the homicidal-death-cult known as our federal government employs dialectic thinking as its modus operandi. For when we constituents remain locked into dialectical thinking, we cannot see out of the box, and then our elected officials can (and do) fuck us at will.
But before we dedicate more time deconstructing what the Hegelian Dialectic is, and where it came from, first some more backstory…
To catch-up on some previous history, please see first post: Welcome to The Hypotenuse
As an important caveat, I am a recovering Leftist, with impeccable credentials. In 2012, after visiting another liberal utopia, Copenhagen, my wife and I decided to move to Portland, OR with our 3 year old son in tow. We wanted to cash in on the American, quasi-equivalent of these venerated Danish socialist ideals…things like: robust public transportation initiatives, social security nets (in the form of welfare and socialized medicine), and, let’s be real, for the rapidly proliferating progressive drug policies. Portland was the perfect solution for us. We’d only have to move 3,000 miles; and we’d get to retain our citizenship. After arriving, we quickly sold our car to rely almost exclusively on public transportation, got onto Oregon Medicaid while my wife was in-between jobs, and soon become frequent visitors to the highly-stylized cannabis dispensaries which dotted every neighborhood in the city.
In short: we so effortlessly slipped down into the liberal abyss.
After a few months, however, cracks started to be revealed in the hastily spackled facade of Portland (which we then promptly ignored; for years). We learned to simply overlook the infectious blight that comes with permissive urban social policies. For example, when a homeless person began to shit in our backyard on a nightly basis, we simply put up motion detector security lights. Did it stop the shitting? No! But it’s what Liberals do to solve problems….they buy things (or they move to a slightly-less Liberal city).
Years later, when a gang of partially deranged miscreants took over a little corner of our lovely, lil’ neighborhood (the pride of Portland) and opened up both a makeshift brothel and a stolen bike chop-shop, complete with barrel fires in the street and scantily clad hookers (did I mention it was adjacent to the elementary school?), I started to ask myself questions like, “Is this safe?” But the Liberati (my Bleeding Heart neighbors) assured me that not only was this illegal, renegade-misfit-hobo-scumfuck operation safe, I was indeed being selfish and despicable for even asking myself these questions, and that I should, “Buy them a sandwich, because they were probably hungry!” You see? The solution, again, was that I should spend money.
It wasn’t until the draconian, city-wide COVID restrictions starting around April of 2020, however, that my eyes were really opened to the fundamental problems of residing in a collectivist enclave. These were the types of problems that wouldn’t just result in a smear of hobo shit transferring to my sneaker; this was life and death. One day, as I inched forward through a seemingly miles-long-line to get to the grocery store, thanks to the city-wide ‘protective protocols’ that were enacted due to the outrageously overblown response to “COVID”, I had a sneaking suspicion that these rules would never go away (they lasted more than two years and are still in effect in many places (New York/Canada, plus the WHO is diligently working to codify global policies for “future pandemics” that will in effect supersede any nation-state hegemony- in short: they will be back). The problem in Portland back in 2020, however, was that:
A) They were only letting 30 people into the grocery store at a time.
B) They were making everyone else line up outside on those ridiculous little circles which the city had plastered to the sidewalk at seemingly random 6 foot intervals. This only heightened everyone’s trepidation to simply move forward and enter the
fucking store.
C) When you finally made it to the last time-out circle near the entrance, you had to first subject yourself to a rather intrusive ‘health and safety’ questionnaire proctored by one of the Millennial Stasi vanguard they had positioned by the door.
On this day, my dialogue went something like this:
A female employee-cum-security guard eyed me suspiciously as I shifted anxiously inside the confines of my circular sidewalk jail cell. I’d seen at least 5 people exit the store on the other side and her comrades still hadn’t radioed over to let me in. After 45 minutes in line, I’m champing at the bit, as my son, who was then 8 and standing beside me, is already hungry and I haven’t even bought the food yet, let alone thought about cooking it.
Dingbat Millenial: “When’s the last time you were…in?” she asks in that insipid tone that the self-righteous, overeducated youth employs to try and lord power
over you. She smooths her mechanics overalls and awaits my response.Me: “Yesterday.” I resist the urge to roll my eyes, because we had this exact same conversation the day before (and the day before that) as the grocery store was only a block away, and we didn’t own a car…remember?
Dingbat Millenial: Taking a carefully sanitized carriage from the dedicated, onsite disinfecting crew, “Well, only 30 people are allowed in at any time…”
Me: Getting progressively more annoyed. “Yes, I know the rules. Thank you.”
Dingbat Millenial: She is flummoxed, but remains undeterred. She looks down at my son. In that same tone: “Um, only one family member is allowed in the store at a time?”
Me: I nearly give into the desire to decapitate her. Remember, I’m already 45 minutes into this ordeal and I haven’t even entered the store. I retort, “He’s eight. I’m not going to leave my eight-year-old home alone while I’m gone for over an hour, thanks to these ridiculous lines, buying groceries so we can eat.”
Dingbat Millenial: “You should have thought of that.”
Me: I take the newly sanitized carriage from her. “Get the fuck outta my way.” We march in. Whatever satisfaction I have is greatly offset be the creeping suspicion that these kinds of people will soon result in my certain death.
Coming to this understanding is like that old Hitchcockian filming technique where the camera both dollies backward and zooms forward (unironically called a ‘dolly zoom’), which leaves viewers with a perspective distortion (and slight nausea). It is meant to cinematically convey a sense of complete dissolution, something I was feeling acutely at that moment. How could I have been this wrong about something? For if this literal Dingbat of a Millenial can keep me from buying groceries, what else can she be given the power to do? It was on that very day, at that very moment, that I knew that after 6 years in Portland, I had to get as far away from this liberal shithole as possible.
How did we get here? Who gave the authority to deputize this menial 15-dollar-an-hour employee to determine who and who-could-not buy groceries? In the 1980’s, an Arnold Schwarzenegger-like character would have simply shoved this woman through a rack of potted plants and strutted inside. But that’s the point. Trust me, it’s no mistake that our meritocratic society, which has so successfully functioned (for centuries), has been meticulously dismantled. It’s how you get from taking authority from police officers, principals, mayors, vice presidents, etc. to having to obey the absurd dictates of some grocery store clerk. This is the problem-reaction-solution, or even better, the thesis-antithesis-synthesis paradigm in action. It’s how our sadistic social architect overlords pull us continually to the Left, dismantling and destroying traditions as they go. There is a saying:
“No one knows why certain traditions exist, until they go away, and then all the problems come back.”
So let’s dissect some of our more established western traditions, the ones for decades (if not centuries) we agreed with and adhered to, and see how they’re being deliberately dismantled through the use of the Hegelian Dialect, thesis-antithesis-synthesis paradigm, shall we?
Let’s start with something easy and free of emotion… say, something like…I dunno, abortion.
Long before 1973, when prospective mothers weren’t allowed to vacuum out their baby’s brains in every state, the thought of the morality of this, let alone the legality, would have seemed incomprehensible. The tradition was that we loved, valued and cherished babies, because they were heaven-sent little bundles of perfection that made our lives worth living.
And so the thesis, the commonly agreed to tradition, was that “Babies are good”. Somewhere along the lines, however, “someone” put it into our heads that “Babies are bad”, or the antithesis, because 1) women of color would continue to have kids who wouldn’t matriculate into upstanding taxpayers, and 2) women of means wouldn’t be able to go out and sell their time for a wage (work), and/or they wouldn’t be allowed to both sleep with their college professor and stay in school (for example), thus forfeiting this contingent of self righteous and self loathing individuals seemingly bred for the explicit purpose of inverting the family value structure.
Our social architects worked overtime midway through the last century to convince young women to murder their babies and abandon their families for jobs because then the federal government could practically double their tax base (two working parents) and destroy the family unit (bonus), which is one of those pesky things (like religion) which is an inconvenience to total government control. And so, like all Hegelian Dialectics, the point isn’t to kill ALL babies, just some babies….the ones they don’t want (the ones who aren’t going to contribute as effectively to the tax base). It’s really no accident that 86% of Planned Parenthoods are located in minority neighborhoods. But they do, admittedly, also go after the aforementioned coeds, who are diligently working their way toward multiple degrees and who will both effectively contribute to the tax base, and be the shining example of how modern women can “have it all”, modeling to females everywhere on how to prioritize egoic ambition over God-given maternal splendor.
And so the extreme version to the left of the hypotenuse, “let’s kill all babies”, softens the blow for when “they” ultimately suggest the ultimatum in the middle….”ok, ok, we’ll just kill some babies” (but only for the benefit of the mothers, of course, and not for those social architects tasked with keeping society rigged for the Haves (vs the Have-Nots)). And so where the societal norm ultimately settles look something
like this:
Do you see how clever they were in pulling us to the Left? They know they can’t go too far, and so they set parameters on which babies are deemed acceptable to kill, which sort of ameliorates both factions to the Left and Right of this issue (we can both kill and save some babies; appeasing both groups). The middle point (killing only some babies) appears to be the organic compromise, the “rebound point”, when nothing could be further from the truth. The social architects (demon rat fucks) always wanted to only kill some babies (Lord knows not their own). They aspire to:
A) reduce the amount of brown and black people (and poor people) procreating
B) increase the amount of type-A, driven, future tax payers by systematically funneling them away from a life of motherhood and family
the added bonus is that both A) and B) both dismantle and decimate family units
This is a touchy subject no doubt, and I began this post months before the whole kerfuffle currently raging around the Supreme Court “leak”. Eugenics has a long and sordid history in America, and it’s never gone away….it just morphed into subversive and shadowy institutions like Planned Parenthood. But in order to lessen the rage you might be feeling, if you are indeed “Pro Choice”, let’s use a slightly less incendiary illustration:
Well that middle-ground, the Synthesis in the Thesis-Antithesis-Synthesis paradigm seems rather conditional, doesn’t it? A baby is only “bad” when it’s bad for the mother. But it’s really only bad for the mother when it’s bad for society (obviously this discounts incest and rapes; which according to statistics only account for 3.5% of all abortions; a full 96.50% are performed for social or economic reasons). And so we murder babies when they aren’t “wanted” by the mothers. But any sane human being wants to keep their unborn child alive, but she often capitulates to the unfair social and economic factors (no father, no money, family pressure, etc.) or she is just so immensely brainwashed by the apparatus into thinking that obtaining a Masters degree, or the like, is of more value than raising a miracle child into adulthood, and delighting in all the magic and wonder that goes with it.
The abortion debate has raged for decades, and a few paragraphs isn’t going to add much insight. The ultimate point is that killing babies does not resolve the social issues burdening 96.50% of the women who choose to abort. We as a society need more support structures, and less “easy” and quick solutions. This was merely an exercise, albeit an incendiary one, to illustrate how the Hegelian Dialectic is used.
It’s not Left vs Right; it’s Right vs Wrong. It’s Good vs Evil. Straight fact.
Okay, if you’ve remained calm throughout this rather antagonistic-on-purpose, rollercoaster of a post, you might be thinking, What’s all this have to do with
recalcitrant cyborg sluts? I’m glad you remembered!
These eugenicist, communist, rat fuck “social architects” aren’t seeking to pervert/subvert western democracy and Christian morality on just one front (abortion). Goodness no! This is an all-out assault on everything that is good and just. And so in the above illustration…the thesis is that making love to your human wife (complete with warm gooey flesh) is the ultimate expression of the universe, because if done right, after all, it creates a miracle (by creating another human). That is why it feels so damn good (my apologies to any family members reading this).
The antithesis, one that is currently being shoved down our throats ad nauseam, is that soon enough, we won’t “need” to have messy and dangerous sex… we can soon hop right into the Metaverse and jack-off with mechanized assistance to the image of just about anyone who’s ever roamed planet earth (or even screw an inventive amalgamation of some AI-driven, “human-like” creations). In here, the possibilities are quite literally endless, and it will, no doubt, signal the end of humanity.
The synthesis, or where we are currently at as a society, is that we can choose to simply lock ourselves up in our houses all night obsessively scrolling through PornHub, while ignoring our families (if we’re fortunate enough to have them). After all, it’s not as morally degrading as putting an expensive VR headset on our faces, having sex to a bunch of coded ones and zeros, while moaning to an empty room (it’s just slightly less degrading, and therefore, currently accepted in the zeitgeist). In pictorial form it looks something like this:
The point being, however, in that 2 years (or 3 or 5) we as a society will be pulled further to the Left, because that’s the end-game of this rigged and demonic social upheaval: no love, no happiness, no babies for we parasitic slaves (formerly called humans). Don’t believe that there’s any malicious and/or super-creepy intent to this technology? Here’s what Ray Kurzweil, the infamous “futurist”, transhumanist and the prognosticator of the “singularity”, who’s influenced just about every technology company on the globe, when given the opportunity to turn himself into anyone in the AI realm, decided to transform himself into some broken down hooker…
Click to play: Ray Kurzweil's Inner Whore
THESE are the sick, satanic assholes deciding our futures, and worse yet, our children’s futures. They always force-feed us the most morally repugnant thing we can conceive of (to the far Left of the hypotenuse) so that we will capitulate to the degenerate thing they were actually trying to get us to agree to (somewhere in the middle of the segment). But the pull to the Left is relentless, and they will eventually succeed in submerging us into their cesspool of toxic filth, by grabbing clumps of our hair and drowning us in it. Our only hope is to pull (hard) back to the right. Refuse to capitulate. No murdered babies, no sex with AI, no muzzling of healthy human beings. The Right (Christian Conservatives) used to keep the balance, by providing ballast for the sinking ship that is western culture. But you must not leave your freedom (and your future) in the hands of elected bureaucrats. The good ones are dead and gone. Unfortunately you’re going to have to take a stand. You’re gonna have to turn off Netflix and log out of TikTok. We (as a unified collective) need to say no to the Ray Kurzweil’s of the world. We must stop the lobbyists who are advocating for even more permissive abortion policies. And we must say “fuck you” to the dingbat, childless, and sex-crazed Millennials who are trying to prevent us from feeding our beloved children.
*Endnote: As stated above, the Hegelian Dialectic is often articulated as thesis-antithesis-synthesis, but is often also referred to as problem-reaction-soultion. It is this nomenclature that is key to understanding how evil this paradigm really is, for the controlling entities actually create problems on purpose so they can then offer proposed solutions (after the anticipated, overblown reaction occurs), resulting in society settling into a predetermined compromise, or “rebound point”.
Think: COVID hysteria and the government-sponsored “vaccines”.
But for this post, I simply wanted to focus on how our social architects constantly and purposefully drag society as a whole to the Left (death). Fun!